Press Release: SPS Fears For Yarmouth Harbour’s Unique Charm

Posted on 29 Jan 2010

The Solent Protection Society has responded to the Yarmouth Harbour Board’s request for feedback on their Inner Harbour Reconfiguration proposals.

The mission of the Solent Protection Society is to ensure the ecological and environmental well-being and wise management of the Solent area, its natural beauty and amenities, so that these may continue to be enjoyed by present and future generations.

The Society considers that the proposals for reconfiguration of the inner harbour at Yarmouth, as currently formulated, do not reflect the objectives of the mission statement in many respects.  The Society is concerned to ensure that all the proper procedures related to the environmental matters are being or will be carried out.  There is also concern that some of the operational aspects of the new proposal will lead to a significant loss of amenity, both with respect to the general appearance of the Harbour, and to its wide availability for enjoyment by present and future generations.

Solent Protection Society’s response to the Yarmouth Harbour Board gives the Society’s view on the impact of designations, including Habitats Regulations; flood defence; aesthetics; capacity for yacht moorings; safety and alternatives to the proposals.

SPS Response to Yarmouth Harbour Reconfiguration Proposals

 Solent Protection Society Mission statement

The mission of the Society is to ensure the ecological and environmental well-being and wise management of the Solent area, its natural beauty and amenities, so that these may continue to be enjoyed by present and future generations.

SPS  interest

The Society considers that the project as currently formulated does not reflect the objectives of the mission statement in many respects.  The Society is concerned to ensure that all the proper procedures related to the environmental matters are being or will be carried out.  There is also concern that some of the operational aspects of the new proposal will lead to a significant loss of amenity, both with respect to the general appearance of the Harbour, and to its wide availability for enjoyment by present and future generations.

The Society seeks to support local communities: The Yarmouth & Thorley Community Plan states “The emphasis within Conservation Areas is on ensuring local character is strengthened, not diminished, by change. The area was designated in 1969  in recognition of the special architectural and historic importance of the town.” While this constraint does not arise out of the Harbour Authority’s statutory powers and duties, it certainly gives a clear guide to the Authority.

Environment

Impact of designations

It is quite clear that the rearrangement of piling and pontoons within the Harbour constitutes  a ” plan or project” within the context of the Habitats Regulations.  In the Society’s view, an Appropriate Assessment under the terms of habitats regulations would be required.  To date we see no evidence that such an Assessment is planned.

A further requirement of the Habitats Regulations is that a plan or project is considered alone or in combination with other plans or projects.  Inevitably there will be projects in the very near future relating to flood defence that will closely relate to the rearrangement of the Harbour. These will arise from the publication of the second shoreline management plan which is imminent.  SPS believes that, as an absolute minimum, the Harbour rearrangement project should be considered in combination with these flood defence aspects. Indeed, redevelopment of the harbour may have considerable flood defence benefits to the local community if planned in an integrated way.

At a more general level, the harbour may be a separate legal entity but it is indivisible from the town on which any development in the harbour will necessarily impact directly . Therefore, the town and harbour should be seen as one unit. Unilateral activities in the harbour which could damage the overall atmosphere should be avoided.

It is clear from the description of the project that the commissioners envisage greater use of the upper Yar.  This modification to the operations and activities must be considered within the terms of the scheme of management of the Solent European Marine Site.  Evidence suggests that the upper Yar is one of the few places in the whole of the Solent where saltmarsh is accreting rather than retreating.  It therefore represents an important ecological asset, and one that should not be put at risk as a result of increased activity without proper precautionary measures, including monitoring, being put into place.

There may also be constraints and procedures to be applied arising out of the AONB status, and Heritage considerations including the impact of any proposals on the setting of Yarmouth Castle.

Flood defence

Revisions to the shoreline management plan are due to be published shortly, and it seems inappropriate to proceed with a major reorganisation of the Harbour without taking the requirements of the shoreline management plan and associated impact on flood defences into account.

Aesthetics

A significant part of the charm and character  of the Harbour is the wide mix of vessels that use it, particularly the more traditional types of vessel such as long keel gaff rigged boats with bowsprits. Such vessels find it much more difficult to operate within a marina environment, especially one where the tides can run strongly across the berths.  Thus quite apart from the manoeuvring and safety aspects, on which the RYA and the Cruising Association are better qualified to comment, the proposed new Harbour layout will undoubtedly change the mix of visiting vessels with consequent effect on the general ambience of the harbour.

While purely commercial considerations are beyond the scope of SPS interest, a significant change in the balance of the charging structure (such as would be implied by the switch to all walk-ashore facilities) would significantly reduce the accessibility and affordability of this harbour to a wide range of the public using the Solent, in particular local residents who have permanent harbour moorings.

Whilst there is clearly a balance to be achieved between the needs of the local economy and the protection of this unique area, any threat to damage it  by one organisation should be resisted unless it can be shown that the benefits  outweigh the detriment to all other interests. The perceived benefit to a few yachtsmen who would prefer to walk ashore  and the financial gain that this brings to the Harbour Commissioners clearly do not outweigh the loss of amenity to the greater number of residents and visitors.

The Society endorses the views expressed by Mr Ben Collins relating to the impact on Yarmouth’s heritage architecture.

Capacity

SPS is concerned about the general reduction of capacity for yacht moorings at destinations within the Solent area.  Threats to capacity exist at Keyhaven Lymington Bembridge and Chichester (East Head).  The Society therefore finds it disappointing that the proposed project contains no potential for capacity increase To achieve a capacity increase without harming the ambience of the town is difficult, but the possibility of developing an outer harbour would locate such a development as far as possible from the current harbour, and may even allow the character of the existing harbour to be substantially unchanged,

Safety

SPS supports the comments of Mr. Granger in relation to compliance with the latest codes of practice for the construction of yacht harbours.  With regards to other operational safety aspects, the Cruising Association, Royal Yachting Association, and local yacht clubs are better placed to comment

Alternatives

Consideration should be given to the no-action alternative.  It is probable that by one means or another revenue from the operation of the ferry could be returned to previous levels, and possibly increased.  It could well be that the fear of long-term loss of revenue from ferry operation is overstated.

We are aware that an outer harbour project that encompasses the area of water currently occupied by the moorings outside the Harbour to the west of the pier and main entrance has been considered.

In the light of the various concerns expressed above, it would seem that solutions such as the outer harbour should be investigated further.  Such a scheme could allow a significant increase in the capacity of the Harbour; address  the manoeuvring aspects of the present Harbour and the current Harbour redevelopment proposal; and may integrate more easily with other plans or projects such as the need to enhance flood defence. Significantly, such a scheme could substantially protect the character of the present inner harbour, and could incorporate necessary remedial works on the existing breakwater.

While it is recognized that the cost of construction of a new mole would be high, the regeneration potential of a new Harbour facility and its contribution to the general economy of the Isle of Wight represent such an important consideration that such a project should be examined closely before proceeding with the present proposal, including an assessment of public support for such a radical proposal.  It is, however, recognised that obtaining environmental consents for such a project would rest upon it being clearly demonstrated that such a project generated a net environmental gain.

Press Release: SPS Fears For Yarmouth Harbour’s Unique Charm

Posted on 29 Jan 2010

The Solent Protection Society has responded to the Yarmouth Harbour Board’s request for feedback on their Inner Harbour Reconfiguration proposals.

The mission of the Solent Protection Society is to ensure the ecological and environmental well-being and wise management of the Solent area, its natural beauty and amenities, so that these may continue to be enjoyed by present and future generations.

The Society considers that the proposals for reconfiguration of the inner harbour at Yarmouth, as currently formulated, do not reflect the objectives of the mission statement in many respects.  The Society is concerned to ensure that all the proper procedures related to the environmental matters are being or will be carried out.  There is also concern that some of the operational aspects of the new proposal will lead to a significant loss of amenity, both with respect to the general appearance of the Harbour, and to its wide availability for enjoyment by present and future generations.

Solent Protection Society’s response to the Yarmouth Harbour Board gives the Society’s view on the impact of designations, including Habitats Regulations; flood defence; aesthetics; capacity for yacht moorings; safety and alternatives to the proposals.

Summary of the Concerns in West Wight Presentation

Posted on 26 Apr 2008

The following points have emerged from meetings with interested parties and residents in West Wight. At the Yarmouth end of the route there is a different emphasis on the issues from that in Lymington. Focus is on traffic issues.

  • All residents support the need for a modern, reliable ferry service.
  • Operational risk and environmental damage are not major issues. However there are points in the Lymington risk assessment that should be followed up as relevant to Yarmouth.
  • Marshalling of vehicles waiting to load is already tight at peak times and traffic backs on to the main road. Increased loads will be difficult to manage without finding new solutions. A proposed new layout which impacted on the coach stops and roundabout was recently rejected. The land affected is partially owned by the YHC and partly by the Council. All these issues are serious and outstanding. Long term, flood defence requirements are likely to further limit capacity. There is concern that this issue remains unresolved.
  • There is considerable conjecture that whilst current Wightlink management have publicly stated that commercial policy with regard to heavy commercial traffic will not change, this is voluntary and could not be enforced if management or ownership were to change. A policy change would have a considerable adverse impact on residents, enjoyment of the harbour and the West Wight roads.

These concerns are increased by information available about the vessels and other related issues:-

  • They are ‘designed for … change in traffic mix on the route’, have ‘flexibility to carry a greater and more varied traffic load’. (Ref Wightlink website)
  • They have a much greater carrying capacity for heavy, large vehicles than the current vessels with the increased height being particularly notable.
  • The substantial investment will require a new level of financial return. Increased capacity utilisation is a particularly well known method to achieve this. Handling more, larger commercial traffic outside of peak car and coach movements is now possible.
  • There is already great pressure on the access roads to Fishbourne so switching could be forced on Wightlink.

Reported by SPS Council Member Antony Matusch

Yarmouth Pier

Posted on 01 Oct 2007

Yarmouth’s 609 foot pier which opened in 1876, is the longest wooden pier in the UK and a Grade II listed building. The pier is in need of restoration, its main greenheart piles being eaten away by gribble worms.

The restoration and associated works, such as creating an archive and community events, are likely to cost about £450,000. The Heritage Lottery Fund has made a grant of £350,500 and the Pier Appeal Fund, headed by Alan Titchmarsh, aims to raise money to support the restoration and to keep the pier open as a facility for the public. One of the conditions of the Heritage Lottery Fund is the involvement of the community and hence there will be a number of events throughout the year, which people will be invited to attend, culminating in a reopening ceremony during the first half of 2008.

Terry Gerald

Yarmouth

Posted on 21 Aug 2005

Yarmouth is one of the most picturesque small towns on the island and the oldest. It is an extremely popular yachting destination and being located at the western end of the Solent, Yarmouth Harbour is a popular place for yachtsmen to call into on passage to or from France or the West Country. Despite its enormous popularity Yarmouth has remained almost completely unspoiled, retaining its unique style and atmosphere.

South of the bridge is the Yar river which is navigable by dinghy as far as the causeway at Freshwater. The river and its associated salt marshes and mud flats are a haven to several breeds of birds throughout the year, including Brent Geese, Shelduck, Teal and Widgeon.